Qredo \UK

Qredo built a decentralized digital asset management infrastructure for institutions, offering multi-party computation (MPC) custody without private keys. The value proposition was eliminating single points of failure in crypto custody while enabling instant settlement and programmable governance. They targeted the institutional crypto custody market during the 2017-2021 bull run when enterprises were desperate for secure, compliant ways to hold digital assets. The 'why now' was regulatory pressure post-Mt.Gox and institutional FOMO into crypto. They raised $95M from top-tier investors including Coinbase Ventures and 10T Holdings, positioning themselves as infrastructure for the tokenized economy. However, they launched into a market dominated by established players like Fireblocks, Anchorage, and BitGo who had regulatory moats and enterprise relationships. Qredo's Layer 2 blockchain approach added complexity without clear differentiation, and their timing coincided with the 2022 crypto winter and cascading failures (Luna, FTX, Celsius) that froze institutional adoption.

SECTOR Financials
PRODUCT TYPE Blockchain/Crypto
TOTAL CASH BURNED $95.0M
FOUNDING YEAR 2018
END YEAR 2024

Discover the reason behind the shutdown and the market before & today

Failure Analysis

Failure Analysis

Qredo died from a lethal combination of market timing, competitive saturation, and capital inefficiency during the 2022-2024 crypto winter. They entered a custody market...

Expand
Market Analysis

Market Analysis

The institutional crypto custody market in 2024 is a $500B+ AUM oligopoly dominated by Coinbase Custody, Fireblocks, BitGo, and Anchorage Digital. Coinbase won the...

Expand
Startup Learnings

Startup Learnings

Infrastructure plays need wedge products, not platforms. Qredo built a full-stack custody blockchain when the market wanted point solutions. Modern founders should launch with...

Expand
Market Potential

Market Potential

The institutional crypto custody TAM is real but concentrated. Coinbase Custody holds $130B+ AUM, Fireblocks processes $4T+ annually. However, the market bifurcated: (1) Large...

Expand
Difficulty

Difficulty

MPC custody requires deep cryptography expertise, regulatory compliance infrastructure, and enterprise security certifications (SOC2, ISO27001). However, modern MPC libraries (Fireblocks SDK, Coinbase WaaS APIs,...

Expand
Scalability

Scalability

Custody is a high-margin SaaS business once built (basis points on AUM), but growth is gated by enterprise sales cycles and regulatory approvals. Qredo's...

Expand

Rebuild & monetization strategy: Resurrect the company

Pivot Concept

+

Embedded MPC custody API for vertical SaaS platforms (payroll, invoicing, gaming, AI agents) to offer stablecoin payments and treasury management without becoming money transmitters. Think Stripe Treasury meets Fireblocks, but for non-crypto companies. The wedge is payroll platforms (Gusto, Rippling, ADP) enabling instant global contractor payments in USDC, with Vaultify handling custody, compliance, and FX. Expand to invoicing (Bill.com, Stripe Invoicing) for B2B stablecoin settlements, then gaming studios for in-game economies, then AI platforms for autonomous agent wallets. The moat is regulatory infrastructure (state money transmitter licenses, partnership with a chartered trust company) and vertical-specific workflows (tax withholding for payroll, invoice reconciliation for AP, spending limits for AI agents). Revenue is basis points on transaction volume plus SaaS fees for compliance tools. Modern tech stack: Turnkey for MPC key management, Circle APIs for USDC minting/redemption, Supabase for policy engine, Vercel for dashboard, Stripe for billing, Chainalysis for transaction monitoring. No blockchain overhead; pure API infrastructure.

Suggested Technologies

+
Turnkey (MPC wallet infrastructure)Circle APIs (USDC issuance and redemption)Supabase (policy engine and user management)Vercel (dashboard and developer portal)Stripe (billing and fiat on-ramps)Chainalysis (transaction monitoring and compliance)AWS Nitro Enclaves (secure key storage)Plaid (bank account verification)Persona (KYC/KYB identity verification)Segment (analytics and customer data)

Execution Plan

+

Phase 1

+

Step 1 - Payroll Wedge (Validation): Build a white-label API for one payroll platform (target mid-market SaaS like Deel or Remote) to offer instant USDC contractor payments. Integrate Turnkey for MPC wallets, Circle for USDC, and Plaid for bank off-ramps. Handle compliance (1099 tax reporting, OFAC screening) as a managed service. Charge 50 bps per transaction. Goal: $1M monthly transaction volume within 6 months, proving demand and unit economics. This validates that non-crypto companies will pay for stablecoin rails if compliance is abstracted.

Phase 2

+

Step 2 - Developer Platform (Expansion): Launch self-serve API with SDKs (JavaScript, Python, Go) for any platform to embed custody. Add policy engine (spending limits, multi-sig approvals, whitelisted addresses) and compliance dashboard (transaction monitoring, audit logs). Target invoicing platforms (Bill.com competitors) and expense management tools (Ramp, Brex). Charge $500/month SaaS fee plus 25 bps per transaction. Goal: 20 customers, $5M monthly volume, $50K MRR within 12 months. This proves horizontal scalability beyond payroll.

Phase 3

+

Step 3 - Vertical Expansion (Growth): Build vertical-specific modules: gaming treasury management (in-game currency custody, player payouts), AI agent wallets (programmatic spending with natural language policies), and RWA custody (tokenized treasuries and private credit). Partner with gaming engines (Unity, Unreal) and AI platforms (LangChain, AutoGPT) for distribution. Charge 10-50 bps depending on vertical. Goal: $50M monthly volume, $500K MRR, 100 customers within 24 months. This creates multiple revenue streams and reduces concentration risk.

Phase 4

+

Step 4 - Regulatory Moat (Defensibility): Obtain state money transmitter licenses (start with Texas, New York, California) and partner with a chartered trust company (e.g., Prime Trust successor, Fortress Trust) for qualified custodian status. Launch insurance product (custody insurance, crime insurance) underwritten by Lloyd's of London. This enables enterprise sales to banks and fintechs requiring regulatory assurances. Goal: $500M monthly volume, $2M MRR, Series B fundraise within 36 months. At this scale, become infrastructure for the next wave of stablecoin adoption, with defensibility from compliance moats and ecosystem lock-in.

Monetization Strategy

+
Hybrid model: (1) Transaction fees: 10-50 basis points on stablecoin volume depending on vertical (payroll is 50 bps, high-volume gaming is 10 bps). (2) SaaS fees: $500-$5,000/month for API access, policy engine, and compliance dashboard, tiered by transaction volume. (3) Compliance services: $10K-$50K annual retainers for white-glove KYC/KYB, transaction monitoring, and audit support for enterprise customers. (4) Yield share: 50/50 split on interest earned from customer stablecoin balances held in T-bills or money market funds (similar to Stripe Treasury). Target blended take rate of 30 bps on volume. At $1B monthly volume (achievable within 3 years given stablecoin payment growth), that is $3M monthly revenue or $36M ARR. Gross margins of 80 percent after infrastructure costs (Turnkey, Circle, Chainalysis). Path to profitability at $50M ARR with 50-person team. Exit via acquisition by Stripe, Adyen, or Coinbase as embedded custody becomes table stakes for payment platforms, or IPO if we reach $200M ARR and become the Plaid of stablecoin infrastructure.

Disclaimer: This entry is an AI-assisted summary and analysis derived from publicly available sources only (news, founder statements, funding data, etc.). It represents patterns, opinions, and interpretations for educational purposes—not verified facts, accusations, or professional advice. AI can contain errors or ‘hallucinations’; all content is human-reviewed but provided ‘as is’ with no warranties of accuracy, completeness, or reliability. We disclaim all liability for reliance on or use of this information. If you are a representative of this company and believe any information is inaccurate or wish to request a correction, please click the Disclaimer button to submit a request.