Base Therapeutics \China

Base Therapeutics was a Chinese biotech startup founded in 2021 by Xu Tianhong, focused on developing novel therapeutics leveraging computational biology and AI-driven drug discovery. The company raised $34.5M from prominent investors including Baidu and Great Eagle VC, positioning itself at the intersection of China's booming AI sector and the global race for precision medicine. The 'Why Now' was compelling: AlphaFold had just revolutionized protein structure prediction in 2020, China was aggressively investing in biotech self-sufficiency post-COVID, and Baidu's AI infrastructure provided a strategic moat. Base likely aimed to accelerate drug candidate identification using machine learning models trained on Chinese patient data—a massive untapped dataset advantage. However, the company collapsed in 2025 after just 4 years, a critical juncture when most biotech startups are entering Phase I/II trials. The failure highlights the brutal reality that computational predictions don't translate to clinical efficacy without deep wet-lab validation, regulatory navigation, and patient recruitment infrastructure.

SECTOR Health Care
PRODUCT TYPE Biotech
TOTAL CASH BURNED $34.5M
FOUNDING YEAR 2021
END YEAR 2025

Discover the reason behind the shutdown and the market before & today

Failure Analysis

Failure Analysis

Base Therapeutics died from a fatal combination of Product/Tech Failure and capital inefficiency, rooted in the classic biotech trap: over-investing in computational infrastructure without...

Expand
Market Analysis

Market Analysis

The AI drug discovery market has matured significantly since Base's 2021 founding, with clear winners and losers emerging. Survivors like Insilico Medicine (Hong Kong,...

Expand
Startup Learnings

Startup Learnings

Biotech requires clinical co-founders, not just ML engineers. Base likely had a team of computational experts but lacked a Chief Medical Officer or VP...

Expand
Market Potential

Market Potential

The global AI drug discovery market is projected to reach $4B by 2027 (CAGR 28%), and China represents 30%+ of that TAM due to...

Expand
Difficulty

Difficulty

Biotech remains the hardest category to rebuild even with modern AI tools. While AlphaFold3, ESMFold, and RFdiffusion have democratized protein structure prediction, and platforms...

Expand
Scalability

Scalability

Biotech has fundamentally non-scalable unit economics in early stages. Each drug candidate requires bespoke wet-lab validation, animal studies, and multi-phase human trials—costs that don't...

Expand

Rebuild & monetization strategy: Resurrect the company

Pivot Concept

+

A capital-efficient AI drug discovery startup focused on rare genetic diseases in the Chinese population, using a fast-follower strategy to design improved versions of clinically validated drugs. Instead of chasing novel targets, Genewise identifies drugs in Phase II/III trials (globally) that have proven mechanism-of-action but suboptimal properties (poor oral bioavailability, severe side effects, high cost). We use open-source AI models (AlphaFold3, RFdiffusion, Manifold) to design superior molecules, then rapidly validate via Chinese CROs (WuXi, GenScript) and file INDs with NMPA within 18 months. Revenue model: Partner with Chinese pharma companies (Jiangsu Hengrui, BeiGene) who provide $3-5M per target in preclinical funding, retaining 50% economics on approved drugs. This eliminates the need for massive VC rounds and aligns incentives—pharma partners want drugs, not AI papers. The wedge is rare diseases affecting Han Chinese populations (specific HLA haplotypes, founder mutations) where Western pharma underinvests, giving us regulatory fast-track status and orphan drug exclusivity.

Suggested Technologies

+
AlphaFold3 and ESMFold for protein structure prediction (open-source, no training required)RFdiffusion for de novo protein binder design (open-source from Baker Lab)Manifold Bio or Chemify for retrosynthesis and synthesis route optimizationBenchling for cloud-based lab notebook and data management (replaces expensive LIMS)WuXi AppTec and GenScript for outsourced synthesis, binding assays, and animal studies (pay-per-project, no capex)Supabase for patient data management (PIPL-compliant, hosted in China)Stripe Atlas for US entity formation (enables US VC fundraising while operating in China)Claude or GPT-4 for automated literature review and prior art analysis (reduces scientist time by 40%)Vercel and Next.js for internal data dashboards (track molecule candidates, assay results, trial timelines)

Execution Plan

+

Phase 1

+

Step 1 - Target Selection and Pharma Partnership (Months 1-6): Identify 3 rare genetic diseases prevalent in Chinese populations with existing Phase II drugs that have suboptimal properties. Example: A kinase inhibitor for a specific leukemia subtype that works but causes severe neutropenia. Use PubMed + Claude to analyze 500+ papers and identify the molecular cause of side effects. Approach 5 Chinese pharma companies (Hengrui, BeiGene, Innovent) with a specific proposal: We will design an improved version of Drug X for $3M in preclinical funding plus 50-50 profit split. Close 1 partnership. This validates demand and funds the next 18 months without VC dilution.

Phase 2

+

Step 2 - AI-Driven Molecule Design and Wet-Lab Validation (Months 6-12): Use AlphaFold3 to model the target protein and existing drug binding site. Use RFdiffusion to generate 50 novel molecules with improved binding affinity and predicted lower off-target effects. Outsource synthesis of top 10 candidates to GenScript (cost: $50K total). Run binding assays and cellular toxicity screens via WuXi (cost: $200K). Iterate based on results—if all 10 fail, pivot to a different target within the partnership. Goal: Identify 1 lead candidate with 10x better selectivity and 50% reduced toxicity vs. existing drug. This is your IND-ready molecule.

Phase 3

+

Step 3 - Preclinical Package and NMPA IND Filing (Months 12-18): Outsource GLP toxicology studies (rat, dog) and PK/PD profiling to WuXi (cost: $1.5M, funded by pharma partner). Engage a Chinese regulatory consultant (cost: $100K) to prepare the IND application for NMPA. File IND for rare disease fast-track designation (6-month review vs. 12 months standard). Simultaneously, publish a preprint on bioRxiv showing your AI design process and preclinical data—this attracts VC attention and validates your platform for future targets. Goal: NMPA IND approval by Month 18, enabling Phase I trial start.

Phase 4

+

Step 4 - Phase I Trial and Series A Fundraising (Months 18-30): Pharma partner funds Phase I trial in China (cost: $3M, 20-40 patients). Your role: Monitor data, prepare publications, and use Phase I safety data to raise a $20M Series A from biotech VCs (8VC, Lux Capital, or Chinese firms like Qiming Venture Partners). Pitch: We have a de-risked clinical asset in humans, a validated AI platform, and 2 more partnered programs in preclinical. Series A funds internal pipeline expansion—pick 2 additional targets where you retain 100% economics (no pharma partner). Goal: Phase I data showing safety and early efficacy signals, plus $20M in the bank to become a standalone drug company.

Monetization Strategy

+
Hybrid model combining pharma partnerships and internal pipeline. Phase 1 (Years 1-3): Partner with 3 Chinese pharma companies at $3-5M per target for preclinical development. Retain 50% profit share on approved drugs. This generates $9-15M in non-dilutive capital and proves the platform. Phase 2 (Years 3-5): Use Series A ($20M) to develop 2 internal programs where we retain 100% economics. Target rare diseases with small patient populations (5,000-20,000 globally) where orphan drug pricing ($100K-300K per patient per year) enables profitability with modest market share. Phase 3 (Years 5-7): License internal programs to global pharma (Roche, Novartis) for $50M upfront + $200M in milestones + 10-15% royalties. This is the exit for early investors. Long-term (Years 7-10): Build a portfolio of 5-7 approved rare disease drugs generating $500M+ annual revenue. Maintain the AI platform as a competitive moat, but the business model is a biotech royalty company, not a software company. Key insight: By focusing on fast-follower rare diseases and pharma partnerships, we avoid the $100M+ capital requirement of platform plays and reach profitability faster.

Disclaimer: This entry is an AI-assisted summary and analysis derived from publicly available sources only (news, founder statements, funding data, etc.). It represents patterns, opinions, and interpretations for educational purposes—not verified facts, accusations, or professional advice. AI can contain errors or ‘hallucinations’; all content is human-reviewed but provided ‘as is’ with no warranties of accuracy, completeness, or reliability. We disclaim all liability for reliance on or use of this information. If you are a representative of this company and believe any information is inaccurate or wish to request a correction, please click the Disclaimer button to submit a request.