Failure Analysis
Leishen Power died from the classic hardware startup trap: entering a capital-intensive, scale-dependent market against entrenched incumbents without sufficient differentiation or customer lockup. The...
Leishen Power was a Chinese battery technology company founded in 2016 that aimed to develop and manufacture advanced lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles and energy storage systems. The company positioned itself during China's aggressive push toward EV adoption and renewable energy infrastructure, attempting to compete in a market dominated by CATL, BYD, and international players like LG Chem and Panasonic. With $250M in funding, Leishen sought to achieve breakthrough energy density and cost advantages through proprietary cell chemistry and manufacturing processes. The timing seemed perfect—China's NEV (New Energy Vehicle) mandate was accelerating, and battery demand was exploding. However, Leishen entered a capital-intensive, scale-dependent industry where established players had 5-10 year head starts in manufacturing optimization, supply chain integration, and customer relationships with major automakers. The company struggled to achieve the manufacturing yield rates and cost structures necessary to compete, while simultaneously burning through capital on R&D and production facility buildout. By 2024, despite significant investment, Leishen could not secure the tier-1 automotive contracts needed to justify continued operations in an increasingly consolidated market.
Leishen Power died from the classic hardware startup trap: entering a capital-intensive, scale-dependent market against entrenched incumbents without sufficient differentiation or customer lockup. The...
The global battery industry has evolved into a highly consolidated, scale-driven oligopoly since Leishen's founding in 2016. CATL (Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited) emerged...
Capital intensity is a moat for incumbents: In hardware businesses requiring $1B+ to reach minimum viable scale, early entrants build insurmountable advantages. If you're...
The battery market remains enormous and growing despite Leishen's failure. Global battery demand is projected to reach 4,500 GWh by 2030 (up from ~700...
Battery manufacturing represents one of the highest difficulty rebuilds in all of hardware. The barriers are extreme: (1) Materials science R&D requiring 3-5 year...
Battery manufacturing has brutal unit economics that only improve at massive scale. This is a classic 'scale or die' business with high fixed costs...
Validation: Expand to 10 fleet customers and 2,000+ vehicles. Implement closed-loop optimization: AI recommends charging strategies (charge rate, SOC limits, temperature management), measure impact on degradation vs. control group. Build integrations with major fleet management systems (Geotab, Samsara, Verizon Connect) for seamless data ingestion. Develop residual value certification product: assess battery health for secondary market sales, partner with battery recyclers/repurposers. Achieve measurable outcomes: 20-25% battery life extension, $5K-$10K per vehicle in avoided replacement costs. Secure $2M ARR at $1,200/vehicle/year average. Raise $5M seed round on proof of unit economics and customer retention.
Growth: Launch OEM licensing program: pitch battery management system integration to EV manufacturers. Value prop: reduce warranty costs (batteries are 30-40% of EV warranty expenses), differentiate on battery longevity claims in marketing. Target tier-2 and tier-3 EV manufacturers (Rivian, Lucid, Polestar, Chinese startups) who lack CATL/BYD's battery expertise. Develop insurance/warranty product: underwrite extended battery warranties using superior risk models, take 20-30% of premium as profit. Expand to energy storage systems (ESS): same degradation challenges exist in grid batteries, but with different use patterns. Build vertical-specific models for solar+storage, C&I applications. Reach $15M ARR with 70% from fleet SaaS, 20% from OEM licenses, 10% from warranty products. Raise $20M Series A to fund sales expansion and international growth.
Moat: Achieve data network effects: with 50K+ vehicles and 100M+ charge cycles, prediction models become unbeatable. New competitors can't match accuracy without equivalent data. Build switching costs through deep integrations: fleet operators rely on Voltaic for maintenance scheduling, budgeting, and resale value optimization. Vertical integration into battery-as-a-service: offer subscription model where fleets pay per mile and Voltaic manages all battery costs (replacement, optimization, end-of-life). This captures full lifetime value and creates annuity revenue stream. Expand to adjacent markets: battery health certification for used EV sales (like Carfax for batteries), grid services (V2G optimization, frequency regulation), and battery passport compliance (EU regulation requiring lifecycle tracking). Strategic partnerships: co-develop next-gen BMS hardware with semiconductor companies (NXP, Infineon), integrate with charging networks (ChargePoint, EVgo) for optimized charging. Exit options: acquisition by automotive OEM seeking battery expertise, merger with fleet management platform, or IPO as battery intelligence layer for electrification. Defensibility comes from data moat, customer switching costs, and regulatory tailwinds (battery passport, right-to-repair, circular economy mandates).
Disclaimer: This entry is an AI-assisted summary and analysis derived from publicly available sources only (news, founder statements, funding data, etc.). It represents patterns, opinions, and interpretations for educational purposes—not verified facts, accusations, or professional advice. AI can contain errors or ‘hallucinations’; all content is human-reviewed but provided ‘as is’ with no warranties of accuracy, completeness, or reliability. We disclaim all liability for reliance on or use of this information. If you are a representative of this company and believe any information is inaccurate or wish to request a correction, please click the Disclaimer button to submit a request.