Moka \China

Moka was a Chinese HR SaaS platform focused on Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) and recruitment management for mid-to-large enterprises. Founded in 2015 during China's SaaS boom, Moka aimed to digitize hiring workflows, replacing manual processes with cloud-based talent acquisition tools. The company raised $200M from top-tier investors like GGV Capital and GSR Ventures, positioning itself as a leader in China's HR tech vertical. Moka's value proposition centered on streamlining recruitment pipelines, improving candidate experience, and providing data-driven hiring insights—critical needs as Chinese companies scaled rapidly during the 2015-2020 growth period. The timing seemed perfect: enterprises were digitizing, labor markets were tightening, and HR departments needed modern tools. However, despite strong initial traction and significant capital, Moka failed to achieve sustainable unit economics in a brutally competitive, low-margin SaaS market where customer acquisition costs remained stubbornly high and churn rates climbed as economic conditions deteriorated post-2022.

SECTOR Information Technology
PRODUCT TYPE SaaS (B2B)
TOTAL CASH BURNED $200.0M
FOUNDING YEAR 2015
END YEAR 2025

Discover the reason behind the shutdown and the market before & today

Failure Analysis

Failure Analysis

Moka's failure was a textbook case of unsustainable unit economics in a commoditizing market crushed by platform bundling and macroeconomic headwinds. The root cause...

Expand
Market Analysis

Market Analysis

The global HR tech market is projected at $40B+ by 2025, but the ATS subcategory has bifurcated into winners and losers. In the West,...

Expand
Startup Learnings

Startup Learnings

**Platform Risk is Existential for Point Solutions:** Standalone SaaS tools in categories adjacent to collaboration/productivity (HR, CRM, project management) face catastrophic risk when platform...

Expand
Market Potential

Market Potential

China's HR tech TAM remains substantial—estimated at $8-12B annually as of 2025—but market dynamics have shifted dramatically since Moka's founding. In 2015, the opportunity...

Expand
Difficulty

Difficulty

Building an ATS in 2025 is significantly easier than in 2015. Modern no-code/low-code platforms (Retool, Bubble), pre-built authentication (Clerk, Auth0), cloud infrastructure (AWS/Alibaba Cloud...

Expand
Scalability

Scalability

Enterprise SaaS has inherently limited scalability due to high-touch sales cycles, custom implementation requirements, and linear customer success costs. Moka's model required: (1) Direct...

Expand

Rebuild & monetization strategy: Resurrect the company

Pivot Concept

+

An AI-native recruitment operating system for high-volume hourly hiring (retail, logistics, hospitality, healthcare support roles). Unlike traditional ATS built for white-collar hiring (resume reviews, multi-round interviews), HireOS automates the entire blue-collar hiring funnel: AI phone screening in local languages, automated background checks, shift-based interview scheduling, SMS-first candidate communication, and predictive retention scoring. The wedge: reduce time-to-hire from 14 days to 48 hours and cut recruiter workload by 70% for roles with 100%+ annual turnover. Target customers: logistics companies (Amazon DSPs, DHL franchises), retail chains (convenience stores, QSRs), healthcare staffing agencies. Monetization: $500-2,000/month per location based on hiring volume, with usage-based pricing for AI screening minutes. This is NOT a rebuild of Moka's enterprise ATS—it's a category-specific solution for an underserved, high-pain segment where speed and automation create 10x value and incumbents (Greenhouse, Lever) don't compete effectively.

Suggested Technologies

+
Next.js + TypeScript (web app)React Native (mobile app for hiring managers)Supabase (Postgres + Auth + Realtime)OpenAI GPT-4 + Whisper (AI phone screening, resume parsing)Twilio (SMS/voice for candidate communication)Retool (internal ops dashboard)Vercel (hosting + edge functions)Stripe (payments + usage metering)Checkr API (background checks)Zapier/Make (integrations with HRIS like Gusto, BambooHR)

Execution Plan

+

Phase 1

+

**Step 1 (Wedge): AI Phone Screener for Single Vertical (Month 1-2).** Build a standalone AI phone screening tool for QSR (quick-service restaurant) hiring. Integrate Twilio + OpenAI Whisper to call candidates, ask 5-7 qualifying questions (availability, experience, transportation), and score responses. Charge $50/month per location + $2 per screening call. Target 10 pilot customers (local franchise owners) via cold outreach and local business Facebook groups. Goal: Prove AI screening reduces no-show rates by 40% and saves 10 hours/week per manager. Validate willingness to pay for speed and automation.

Phase 2

+

**Step 2 (Validation): Full Funnel for Hourly Hiring (Month 3-5).** Expand to full ATS: job posting distribution (Indeed, ZipRecruiter auto-post), SMS-based candidate pipelines, shift-based interview scheduling (integrated with Google Calendar), offer letter generation, and onboarding checklists. Add predictive retention scoring using historical hire data (flag candidates likely to quit within 30 days). Price: $500-1,500/month per location based on monthly hires. Target 50 customers across QSR, retail, and logistics. Measure: <48 hour time-to-hire, <15% 30-day turnover, >80% NPS. Iterate based on feedback—likely need better mobile UX for hiring managers and more SMS automation.

Phase 3

+

**Step 3 (Growth): PLG + Integration Ecosystem (Month 6-12).** Launch freemium tier: free for <10 hires/month, paid plans start at $500/month. Build native integrations with payroll/HRIS (Gusto, Rippling, Paychex) to auto-sync new hires. Create a Zapier app for long-tail integrations. Invest in SEO content targeting 'how to hire faster for [retail/logistics/hospitality]' and 'reduce hourly employee turnover.' Launch referral program: existing customers get $500 credit for each new location they refer. Goal: 500 paying locations, $250K MRR, <$10K CAC via PLG. Expand to healthcare support roles (CNAs, home health aides) as second vertical.

Phase 4

+

**Step 4 (Moat): Proprietary Retention Data + Marketplace (Month 13-24).** Build defensibility through data network effects: aggregate anonymized hiring/retention data across thousands of locations to train ML models predicting candidate success. Offer 'HireOS Insights'—benchmarking reports showing how a location's turnover/time-to-fill compares to peers. Launch a candidate marketplace: workers who performed well at one HireOS customer get priority referrals to other customers (with consent), creating a vetted talent pool. Monetize marketplace via placement fees ($200-500 per hire). This creates a flywheel: more customers → better retention models → higher quality hires → more customers. Expand internationally to UK, Canada, Australia (English-speaking markets with similar hourly hiring pain). Target: $5M ARR, path to $50M ARR within 3 years.

Monetization Strategy

+
**Primary Revenue:** SaaS subscription ($500-2,000/month per location) based on hiring volume tiers: <20 hires/month ($500), 20-50 hires ($1,000), 50-100 hires ($1,500), 100+ hires ($2,000). Includes unlimited AI phone screenings, SMS messages, and user seats. **Secondary Revenue:** Usage-based add-ons: (1) Background checks ($25-50 per check, marked up from Checkr's $15-30 cost), (2) Premium integrations (Workday, SAP connectors at $500/month), (3) Dedicated customer success manager ($2,000/month for enterprise customers with 50+ locations). **Tertiary Revenue (Year 2+):** Candidate marketplace placement fees ($200-500 per hire for pre-vetted workers). **Unit Economics:** Target gross margin of 75% (SaaS standard), CAC of $5,000 (via PLG + inside sales), LTV of $18,000 (assuming $1,000 average ACV, 18-month retention), yielding 3.6x LTV:CAC. Payback period: 5-6 months. The model works because: (1) High-volume hiring creates recurring need (customers hire monthly, not annually), (2) AI automation has near-zero marginal cost (screening calls cost $0.10-0.50 each via Twilio + OpenAI), (3) Switching costs increase over time as historical hiring data becomes valuable for retention predictions.

Disclaimer: This entry is an AI-assisted summary and analysis derived from publicly available sources only (news, founder statements, funding data, etc.). It represents patterns, opinions, and interpretations for educational purposes—not verified facts, accusations, or professional advice. AI can contain errors or ‘hallucinations’; all content is human-reviewed but provided ‘as is’ with no warranties of accuracy, completeness, or reliability. We disclaim all liability for reliance on or use of this information. If you are a representative of this company and believe any information is inaccurate or wish to request a correction, please click the Disclaimer button to submit a request.