Failure Analysis
ADAMOS died from the structural contradictions inherent in consortium-led innovation. The joint venture model that seemed like a strength - combining the credibility and...
ADAMOS \Germany
ADAMOS (ADAptive Manufacturing Open Solutions) was a joint venture consortium launched by German industrial giants DMG MORI, Dürr, and Zeiss to create an open IoT platform for manufacturing. The value proposition centered on Industry 4.0 transformation: connecting factory equipment, collecting real-time production data, and enabling predictive maintenance and optimization across heterogeneous machinery. The 'why now' was the convergence of IoT sensors, cloud computing, and the German government's Industrie 4.0 initiative pushing digital transformation. ADAMOS aimed to be the 'Android of manufacturing' - an open ecosystem where machine builders could offer digital services to factory operators, breaking the walled gardens of proprietary systems. The platform promised interoperability, allowing manufacturers to manage multi-vendor equipment through a single pane of glass, with apps for condition monitoring, energy optimization, and production analytics. The consortium model was designed to create network effects: more machine builders joining meant more data sources and richer insights for end customers.
Discover the reason behind the shutdown and the market before & today
Market Analysis
The industrial IoT landscape has consolidated around three tiers since ADAMOS's demise. At the top, Siemens MindSphere and GE Digital (now part of Siemens...
Startup Learnings
Consortium governance is poison for fast-moving markets. Industrial giants move at 18-month planning cycles; software requires weekly iteration. The compromise required to keep all...
Market Potential
The industrial IoT market has exploded since 2017. Global smart manufacturing market size was $214B in 2020 and projected to reach $658B by 2030...
Difficulty
In 2017, building an industrial IoT platform required deep embedded systems expertise, custom edge computing solutions, complex data pipeline architecture for time-series sensor data,...
Scalability
ADAMOS faced classic B2B industrial software unit economics challenges. Each machine builder integration required custom connectors and field engineering. Customer acquisition costs were enormous...
Rebuild & monetization strategy: Resurrect the company
Execution Plan
Phase 2
VALIDATION (Months 4-6): Add conversational AI layer using Claude + RAG over equipment manuals. Operators can text questions like 'Machine 3 alarm code E47 - what does it mean?' and get instant answers with troubleshooting steps. Expand to 20 paying customers at $500/month per machine. Build outcome-tracking dashboard to measure downtime reduction. Integrate with customers' existing CMMS systems (Fiix, UpKeep) via API to auto-log maintenance events. Hire first customer success engineer (former factory maintenance manager) to do onboarding calls and collect feedback. Success metric: $10K MRR, 80%+ customer retention, documented $50K+ in prevented downtime costs.
Phase 3
GROWTH (Months 7-12): Expand to adjacent equipment types (injection molding machines, industrial robots) by training new models on pilot customer data. Launch partner program with 10 equipment distributors, offering 20% revenue share for bundling FactoryPulse with their service contracts. Build self-service onboarding flow: customer receives hardware kit, scans QR code, follows 15-minute setup wizard, system auto-detects equipment type and configures models. Add energy optimization module (identify inefficient operating parameters, suggest adjustments). Raise $3M seed round from industrial-focused VCs (Momenta Partners, Cyrus Capital). Hire 3 field engineers and 2 ML engineers. Success metric: 200 machines under management, $100K MRR, 15% month-over-month growth, CAC payback under 12 months.
Phase 4
MOAT (Months 13-24): Launch federated learning system that trains models across all customer sites without centralizing sensitive data - each edge device contributes to global model improvement while keeping raw data local. This creates compounding advantage: the more customers we have, the better our predictions become, widening the gap vs. competitors. Introduce outcome-based pricing tier: $200/month base + 20% of measured savings (downtime reduction, scrap prevention, energy optimization). This shifts ROI risk to us but dramatically accelerates sales cycles. Build 'FactoryPulse Copilot' - an AI assistant that proactively suggests process improvements by analyzing production patterns across similar machines. Expand internationally via distributor partnerships in Germany, Japan, Mexico. Success metric: 2,000 machines under management, $2M ARR, 50%+ gross margins (hardware at cost, software pure margin), Series A fundraise ($15M) to scale sales and expand to process industries (food/beverage, pharma).
Monetization Strategy
Hybrid hardware + SaaS model with outcome-based pricing tiers. TIER 1 (Starter): $500/month per machine, includes edge device (amortized over 24 months), basic anomaly detection, mobile alerts, conversational AI interface. Target: small shops with 5-20 machines, $2,500-10K monthly spend. TIER 2 (Professional): $800/month per machine, adds predictive maintenance (failure forecasting 2-4 weeks out), energy optimization recommendations, integration with CMMS/ERP systems, dedicated customer success manager. Target: mid-size manufacturers with 20-100 machines, $16K-80K monthly spend. TIER 3 (Enterprise/Outcome-Based): $300/month base per machine + 20% of measured savings (calculated monthly based on prevented downtime hours × customer's cost per hour, plus scrap reduction and energy savings). Requires 12-month commitment and baseline measurement period. Target: sophisticated manufacturers willing to share production data for better models, $50K-500K annual spend. Additional revenue streams: (1) Hardware margin: sell edge devices at $599 (vs. $350 BOM) for customers who want to own vs. lease, (2) Professional services: $15K-50K for custom integrations with legacy SCADA systems, (3) Data licensing: anonymized, aggregated benchmarking data sold to equipment manufacturers and industry analysts ($100K+ annual contracts). Unit economics: CAC $3K (mostly partner commissions), LTV $18K (36-month average retention × $500/month), LTV:CAC ratio 6:1. Gross margin 65% at scale (hardware at cost, software 90%+ margin). Path to $100M ARR: 15,000 machines under management at $550 average monthly revenue per machine.
Related Startup Failures
SAAS (B2B)
115
Lekee
\China
$42.0M
THE VALUE PROPOSITION
All-in-one hotel management SaaS for China's fragmented independent hotel market, digitizing operations from booking to checkout.
CAUSE OF DEATH
Brutal unit economics, low willingness-to-pay from price-sensitive hotel owners, and fierce competition from Alibaba's Fliggy ecosystem.
Rise
2015
Fall
2021
SAAS (B2B)
43
Gogohire
\USA
$2.0M
THE VALUE PROPOSITION
Recruiting automation platform for SMBs to streamline hiring through automated sourcing, screening, and workflow management.
CAUSE OF DEATH
Commoditized feature set, weak differentiation in crowded HR tech market, and inability to prove ROI against established ATS players.
Rise
2014
Fall
2020
SAAS (B2B)
179
Kyte (B2B SaaS)
\India
$10.0M
THE VALUE PROPOSITION
All-in-one digital operations platform for Indian SMEs, replacing spreadsheets with integrated inventory, billing, and CRM tools.
CAUSE OF DEATH
Failed to achieve unit economics in low-ARPU market; high CAC, complex sales cycles, and feature bloat without clear differentiation.
Rise
2020
Fall
2024
Disclaimer: This entry is an AI-assisted summary and analysis derived from publicly available sources only (news, founder statements, funding data, etc.). It represents patterns, opinions, and interpretations for educational purposes—not verified facts, accusations, or professional advice. AI can contain errors or ‘hallucinations’; all content is human-reviewed but provided ‘as is’ with no warranties of accuracy, completeness, or reliability. We disclaim all liability for reliance on or use of this information. If you are a representative of this company and believe any information is inaccurate or wish to request a correction, please click the Disclaimer button to submit a request.