Failure Analysis
Made.com died from a lethal combination of broken unit economics and strategic drift. The original pre-order model was capital-efficient but created 8-12 week delivery...
Made.com \UK
Made.com promised to democratize designer furniture by cutting out the middleman. The value proposition was elegant: connect European consumers directly with manufacturers in Asia and Europe, eliminating retail markup. Customers could access contemporary, well-designed furniture at 30-70% below traditional retail prices. The psychological hook was powerful—you weren't just buying a sofa, you were outsmarting a broken system. The brand positioned itself as the IKEA alternative for design-conscious millennials who wanted quality without the luxury price tag. Pre-order models meant zero inventory risk initially, and the direct-to-consumer approach rode the wave of digitally-native brands disrupting legacy retail. Backed by LastMinute.com founder Brent Hoberman, Made.com had the credibility and capital to scale across Europe rapidly.
Discover the reason behind the shutdown and the market before & today
Market Analysis
The furniture e-commerce landscape in 2024 is a graveyard of DTC dreams, but specific niches are working. Wayfair remains the category leader but has...
Startup Learnings
Pre-order models only work if customers value price over speed, and that window has closed in most categories. Made.com's original 8-12 week delivery was...
Market Potential
The global online furniture market is projected to reach $300B+ by 2030, but it remains fragmented and challenging. Wayfair, the category leader, has struggled...
Difficulty
Furniture e-commerce remains brutally difficult today. Unit economics are challenging due to high CAC, last-mile delivery complexity, and return rates that can exceed 15%...
Scalability
Furniture e-commerce has inherently poor scalability characteristics. Each incremental sale adds linear fulfillment costs—warehousing, last-mile delivery, assembly services, and reverse logistics. Unlike software or...
Rebuild & monetization strategy: Resurrect the company
Execution Plan
Phase 2
Build lightweight B2B portal where HR teams can provision furniture packages for employees, track active subscriptions, and manage returns. Integrate Stripe for billing and create simple buyout flow (employee gets email at month 10 with purchase option at 50% of retail). Establish reverse logistics process with local moving company for returns. Target: 50 active subscriptions across 5 corporate clients.
Phase 3
Negotiate direct wholesale relationships with 3-4 furniture manufacturers for 40-50% off retail, enabling positive unit economics. Build out dedicated warehouse space (5,000 sq ft) in target metro for receiving, inspection, and staging. Hire 2 delivery/setup contractors. Implement inventory management system to track item condition, rental history, and depreciation. Expand to second metro market (target cities with high corporate relocation: Seattle, Raleigh, Nashville).
Phase 4
Launch self-service SMB tier for companies with 10-50 remote employees at $250/month per setup with standardized packages. Build out secondary marketplace where returned furniture is sold at 40-60% off retail to consumers, creating additional revenue stream and solving disposal problem. Establish partnerships with 2-3 corporate housing providers to bundle furniture rental with short-term housing. Target: 500 active subscriptions, $1.2M ARR, positive contribution margin.
Monetization Strategy
B2B subscription revenue: $200-500/month per employee setup depending on package tier (basic home office vs. full apartment furnishing). Target 40% gross margin after furniture costs, delivery, and setup. Buyout revenue: 35% of renters purchase items after 12 months at 50-60% of retail, generating additional 30-40% margin on those transactions. Secondary marketplace: returned furniture sold at 40-60% off retail to consumers, recovering 60-70% of original furniture cost and solving disposal problem. Corporate partnership revenue: 10-15% referral fees from relocation management companies and corporate housing providers who bundle the service. Target unit economics: $300 average monthly subscription, $120 gross profit per month, 18-month average rental duration, 35% buyout rate adding $400 profit per buyout. Customer acquisition cost of $800-1200 (B2B sales cycle) with 12-14 month payback period. At 1,000 active subscriptions: $3.6M ARR from subscriptions, $500K from buyouts, $300K from secondary marketplace = $4.4M revenue with 45% blended gross margin.
Related Startup Failures
MARKETPLACE
483
Yiguo E-commerce
\China
$900.0M
THE VALUE PROPOSITION
China's first major fresh produce e-commerce platform with end-to-end cold chain logistics, backed by $900M from Alibaba and Goldman Sachs.
CAUSE OF DEATH
Crushed by brutal unit economics in fresh food delivery, unable to compete with Alibaba's ecosystem integration and community group-buying models.
Rise
2005
Fall
2020
MARKETPLACE
159
Orbital Express
\Denmark
$120.0M
THE VALUE PROPOSITION
Ultra-fast urban delivery via micro-fulfillment centers and autonomous tech, competing in the quick-commerce explosion.
CAUSE OF DEATH
Unsustainable unit economics and capital intensity crushed by well-funded competitors in a race-to-the-bottom market.
Rise
2016
Fall
2026
MARKETPLACE
210
Baqi (AgTech)
\China
$38.0M
THE VALUE PROPOSITION
Tech-enabled agricultural supply chain connecting Chinese farmers directly to buyers, eliminating intermediaries and improving price transparency.
CAUSE OF DEATH
Unsustainable unit economics in low-margin agriculture combined with capital-intensive logistics infrastructure and competition from Alibaba/JD.com.
Rise
2016
Fall
2023
Disclaimer: This entry is an AI-assisted summary and analysis derived from publicly available sources only (news, founder statements, funding data, etc.). It represents patterns, opinions, and interpretations for educational purposes—not verified facts, accusations, or professional advice. AI can contain errors or ‘hallucinations’; all content is human-reviewed but provided ‘as is’ with no warranties of accuracy, completeness, or reliability. We disclaim all liability for reliance on or use of this information. If you are a representative of this company and believe any information is inaccurate or wish to request a correction, please click the Disclaimer button to submit a request.